This is an archive, please visit for current posts.
PressThink: Ghost of Democracy in the Media Machine
Recent Entries
Like PressThink? More from the same pen:

Read about Jay Rosen's book, What Are Journalists For?

Excerpt from Chapter One of What Are Journalists For? "As Democracy Goes, So Goes the Press."

Essay in Columbia Journalism Review on the changing terms of authority in the press, brought on in part by the blog's individual--and interactive--style of journalism. It argues that, after Jayson Blair, authority is not the same at the New York Times, either.

"Web Users Open the Gates." My take on ten years of Internet journalism, at

Read: Q & As

Jay Rosen, interviewed about his work and ideas by journalist Richard Poynder

Achtung! Interview in German with a leading German newspaper about the future of newspapers and the Net.

Audio: Have a Listen

Listen to an audio interview with Jay Rosen conducted by journalist Christopher Lydon, October 2003. It's about the transformation of the journalism world by the Web.

Five years later, Chris Lydon interviews Jay Rosen again on "the transformation." (March 2008, 71 minutes.)

Interview with host Brooke Gladstone on NPR's "On the Media." (Dec. 2003) Listen here.

Presentation to the Berkman Center at Harvard University on open source journalism and NewAssignment.Net. Downloadable mp3, 70 minutes, with Q and A. Nov. 2006.

Video: Have A Look

Half hour video interview with Robert Mills of the American Microphone series. On blogging, journalism, NewAssignment.Net and distributed reporting.

Jay Rosen explains the Web's "ethic of the link" in this four-minute YouTube clip.

"The Web is people." Jay Rosen speaking on the origins of the World Wide Web. (2:38)

One hour video Q & A on why the press is "between business models" (June 2008)

Recommended by PressThink:

Town square for press critics, industry observers, and participants in the news machine: Romenesko, published by the Poynter Institute.

Town square for weblogs: InstaPundit from Glenn Reynolds, who is an original. Very busy. Very good. To the Right, but not in all things. A good place to find voices in diaolgue with each other and the news.

Town square for the online Left. The Daily Kos. Huge traffic. The comments section can be highly informative. One of the most successful communities on the Net.

Rants, links, blog news, and breaking wisdom from Jeff Jarvis, former editor, magazine launcher, TV critic, now a J-professor at CUNY. Always on top of new media things. Prolific, fast, frequently dead on, and a pal of mine.

Eschaton by Atrios (pen name of Duncan B;ack) is one of the most well established political weblogs, with big traffic and very active comment threads. Left-liberal.

Terry Teachout is a cultural critic coming from the Right at his weblog, About Last Night. Elegantly written and designed. Plus he has lots to say about art and culture today.

Dave Winer is the software wiz who wrote the program that created the modern weblog. He's also one of the best practicioners of the form. Scripting News is said to be the oldest living weblog. Read it over time and find out why it's one of the best.

If someone were to ask me, "what's the right way to do a weblog?" I would point them to Doc Searls, a tech writer and sage who has been doing it right for a long time.

Ed Cone writes one of the most useful weblogs by a journalist. He keeps track of the Internet's influence on politics, as well developments in his native North Carolina. Always on top of things.

Rebecca's Pocket by Rebecca Blood is a weblog by an exemplary practitioner of the form, who has also written some critically important essays on its history and development, and a handbook on how to blog.

Dan Gillmor used to be the tech columnist and blogger for the San Jose Mercury News. He now heads a center for citizen media. This is his blog about it.

A former senior editor at Pantheon, Tom Englehardt solicits and edits commentary pieces that he publishes in blog form at TomDispatches. High-quality political writing and cultural analysis.

Chris Nolan's Spot On is political writing at a high level from Nolan and her band of left-to-right contributors. Her notion of blogger as a "stand alone journalist" is a key concept; and Nolan is an exemplar of it.

Barista of Bloomfield Avenue is journalist Debbie Galant's nifty experiment in hyper-local blogging in several New Jersey towns. Hers is one to watch if there's to be a future for the weblog as news medium.

The Editor's Log, by John Robinson, is the only real life honest-to-goodness weblog by a newspaper's top editor. Robinson is the blogging boss of the Greensboro News-Record and he knows what he's doing.

Fishbowl DC is about the world of Washington journalism. Gossip, controversies, rituals, personalities-- and criticism. Good way to keep track of the press tribe in DC

PJ Net Today is written by Leonard Witt and colleagues. It's the weblog of the Public Journalisn Network (I am a founding member of that group) and it follows developments in citizen-centered journalism.

Here's Simon Waldman's blog. He's the Director of Digital Publishing for The Guardian in the UK, the world's most Web-savvy newspaper. What he says counts.

Novelist, columnist, NPR commentator, Iraq War vet, Colonel in the Army Reserve, with a PhD in literature. How many bloggers are there like that? One: Austin Bay.

Betsy Newmark's weblog she describes as "comments and Links from a history and civics teacher in Raleigh, NC." An intelligent and newsy guide to blogs on the Right side of the sphere. I go there to get links and comment, like the teacher said.

Rhetoric is language working to persuade. Professor Andrew Cline's Rhetorica shows what a good lens this is on politics and the press.

Davos Newbies is a "year-round Davos of the mind," written from London by Lance Knobel. He has a cosmopolitan sensibility and a sharp eye for things on the Web that are just... interesting. This is the hardest kind of weblog to do well. Knobel does it well.

Susan Crawford, a law professor, writes about democracy, technology, intellectual property and the law. She has an elegant weblog about those themes.

Kevin Roderick's LA Observed is everything a weblog about the local scene should be. And there's a lot to observe in Los Angeles.

Joe Gandelman's The Moderate Voice is by a political independent with an irrevant style and great journalistic instincts. A link-filled and consistently interesting group blog.

Ryan Sholin's Invisible Inkling is about the future of newspapers, online news and journalism education. He's the founder of and a self-taught Web developer and designer.

H20town by Lisa Williams is about the life and times of Watertown, Massachusetts, and it covers that town better than any local newspaper. Williams is funny, she has style, and she loves her town.

Dan Froomkin's White House Briefing at is a daily review of the best reporting and commentary on the presidency. Read it daily and you'll be extremely well informed.

Rebecca MacKinnon, former correspondent for CNN, has immersed herself in the world of new media and she's seen the light (great linker too.)

Micro Persuasion is Steve Rubel's weblog. It's about how blogs and participatory journalism are changing the business of persuasion. Rubel always has the latest study or article.

Susan Mernit's blog is "writing and news about digital media, ecommerce, social networks, blogs, search, online classifieds, publishing and pop culture from a consultant, writer, and sometime entrepeneur." Connected.

Group Blogs

CJR Daily is Columbia Journalism Review's weblog about the press and its problems, edited by Steve Lovelady, formerly of the Philadelpia Inquirer.

Lost Remote is a very newsy weblog about television and its future, founded by Cory Bergman, executive producer at KING-TV in Seattle. Truly on top of things, with many short posts a day that take an inside look at the industry.

Editors Weblog is from the World Editors Fourm, an international group of newspaper editors. It's about trends and challenges facing editors worldwide. keeps track of developments from the British side of the Atlantic. Very strong on online journalism.

Digests & Round-ups:

Memeorandum: Single best way I know of to keep track of both the news and the political blogosphere. Top news stories and posts that people are blogging about, automatically updated.

Daily Briefing: A categorized digest of press news from the Project on Excellence in Journalism.

Press Notes is a round-up of today's top press stories from the Society of Professional Journalists.

Richard Prince does a link-rich thrice-weekly digest called "Journalisms" (plural), sponsored by the Maynard Institute, which believes in pluralism in the press.

Newsblog is a daily digest from Online Journalism Review.

E-Media Tidbits from the Poynter Institute is group blog by some of the sharper writers about online journalism and publishing. A good way to keep up

Syndicate this site:

XML Summaries

XML Full Posts

July 21, 2004

Once There Was a New Journalism: Here's Norman Mailer Covering the 1960 Democratic Convention

Novelist, would-be hipster, and one of the most troublesome, quarrelsome, and brilliantly excessive literary characters of his time, Norman Mailer always said he hated journalism. It was 1960. The Democrats were gathered in L.A. John Kennedy was about to be nominated. And Mailer had reporter's credentials for Esquire....

So Mr. Kerry will be attempting at the convention in his hometown of Boston to reinforce his own credentials. But polls indicate that his main argument for support of the voters continues to be that he is not George W. Bush in an election that still promises to be a referendum on the incumbent. That circumstance makes it imperative that Mr. Kerry demonstrate he is a desirable and safe alternative to the beleaguered but still popular Texan.
Jules Witcover, Baltimore Sun, two days ago.

And suddenly I saw the convention, it came into focus for me, and I understood the mood of depression which had lain over the convention, because finally it was simple: the Democrats were going to nominate a man who, no matter how serious his political dedication might be, was indisputably and willy-nilly going to be seen as a great box-office actor, and the consequences of that were staggering and not at all easy to calculate.
Norman Mailer, in Esquire Magazine, forty-four years ago.

On the eve of the 2004 conventions, when dead prose like Witcover’s is the sound of both journalism and politics-as-usual, it is worth recalling—perhaps for the benefit of Byron LaMasters, who may know nothing of this, if not Alex S. Jones, who probably knows it all— that there is another way of “covering” a political convention: Send a writer and let the writer find a language adequate to the event.

“For once let us try to think about a political convention without losing ourselves in housing projects of fact and issue.” That’s the way Norman Mailer begin his portrait of the 1960 Democratic Natiional Convention in Los Angeles, the one that nominated John F. Kennedy for President.

The piece he wrote was called “Superman Comes to the Supermarket,” a title intending to say that the man of the hour, Kennedy, was about to send a powerful (and erotic) jolt into mainstream America— if he won the election. For this was the idea Mailer developed as he tried to make sense of what he saw, heard, and felt in Los Angeles.

“Superman…” appeared in Esquire Magazine well after the event was over. To read it today—and you can, because thanks to Esquire New Journalism (that’s what Tom Wolfe termed it.) Mailer—and the way he wrote—was a new sound in convention coverage. It didn’t sound like what other people were doing. Here are some bits I have chosen to show that.

Excerpts from “Superman Comes to the Supermarket.” (Esquire Magazine, Nov. 1960 issue.)

Here he is beginning to describe John Kennedy, by viewing the candidate first through the eyes of the old fashioned political boss, like a country chairman or big city mayor:

In fact it is a mystery to the boss how Kennedy got to where he is, not a mystery in its structures; Kennedy is rolling in money, Kennedy got the votes in primaries, and, most of all, Kennedy has a jewel of a political machine. It is as good as a crack Notre Dame team, all discipline and savvy and go-go-go, sound, drilled, never dull, quick as a knife, full of the salt of hipper-dipper, a beautiful machine; the boss could adore it if only a sensible candidate were driving it, a Truman, even a Stevenson, please God a Northern Lyndon Johnson, but it is run by a man who looks young enough to be coach of the Freshman team, and that is not comfortable at all…

Mailer on Los Angeles, site of the 1960 Democratic convention: “one has the feeling it was built by television sets giving orders to men.” Attempting to characterize “the Democrats,” he finds this image:

After being with them a week, one thinks of this party as a crazy, half-rich family, loaded with poor cousins, traveling always in caravans with Cadillacs and Okie Fords, Lincolns and quarterhorse mules, putting up every night in tents to hear the chamber quartet of Great Cousin Eleanor invaded by the Texas-twanging steel-stringing geetarists of Bubber Lyndon, carrying its own mean high-school principal, Doc Symington, chided for its manners by good Uncle Adlai, told the route of march by Navigator Jack, cut out every six months from the rich will of Uncle Jim Farley, never listening to the mechanic of the caravan, Bald Sam Rayburn, who assures them they’ll all break down unless Cousin Bubber gets the concession on the garage; it’s the Snopes family married to Henry James, with the labor unions thrown in like a Yankee dollar, and yet it’s true, in tranquility one recollects them with affection, their instinct is good, crazy family good.

The convention took place at the Los Angeles Sports Arena. But its nerve center and War Room was the Biltmore Hotel, where everyone gathered and the big players stayed. Mailer: “The Biltmore is one of the ugliest hotels in the world.”

For three days before the convention and four days into it, everybody collected at the Biltmore, in the lobby, in the grill, in the Biltmore Bowl, in the elevators, along the corridors, three hundred deep always outside the Kennedy suite, milling everywhere, every dark-carpeted grey-brown hall of the hotel, but it was in the Gallery of the Biltmore where one first felt the mood which pervaded all proceedings until the convention was almost over, that heavy, thick, witless depression which was to dominate every move as the delegates wandered and gawked and paraded and set for a spell, there in the Gallery of the Biltmore….

Of course, he didn’t need any quotes from Democrats, or political analysts, or academic experts saying, “there’s a heavy, thick, witless depression hanging over this convention.” He got there by opening his eyes and ears, by keeping them open, and then running all impressions gained in L.A. through his writer’s mind, which had its own preoccupations— the most important of which was style. (The least important would have been polls.) This meant bringing to bear everything he knew—and several things Mailer thought he alone knew—about the United States and its politics, culture and “underground” life. It also meant writing sentences that filled up pages before coming to a close. Here’s Mailer introducing us to some key characters:

Symington, dogged at a press conference, declaring with no conviction that he knew he had a good chance to win, the disappointment eating at his good looks so that he came off hard-faced, mean, and yet slack—a desperate dullness came of the best of his intentions. There was Johnson who had compromised too many contradictions and now the contradictions were in his face… Stevenson had the patina. He came into the room and the room was different, not stronger perhaps (which is why ultimately he did not win), but warmer…. There was Eleanor Roosevelt, fine, precise, hand-worked like ivory. Her voice was almost attractive as she explained in the firm, sad tones of the first lady in this small town why she could not admit Mr. Kennedy, who was no doubt a gentleman, into her political house. One had the impression of a lady who was finally becoming a woman, which is to say that she was just a little bitchy about it all; nice bitchy, charming, it had a touch of art to it…

But this is my favorite character sketch:

Jim Farley. Huge. Cold as a bishop. The hell he would consign you to was cold as ice.

Kennedy arrives at the Biltmore. Mailer studies the scene:

One saw him immediately. He had the deep orange-brown suntan of a ski instructor, and when he smiled at the crowd his teeth were amazingly white and clearly visible at a distance of fifty yards. For one moment he saluted Pershing Square, and Pershing Square saluted him back, the prince and the beggars of glamour staring at one another across a city street, one of those very special moments in the underground history of the world, and then with a quick move he was out of his car and by choice headed into the crowd instead of the lane cleared for him into the hotel by the police, so that he made his way inside surrounded by a mob, and one expected at any moment to see him lifted to its shoulders like a matador being carried back to the city after a triumph in the plaza.

On finding what is not on the surface of the convention, but runs “in parallel” to its events:

Since mystery is an emotion which is repugnant to a political animal (why else lead a life of bad banquet dinners, cigar smoke, camp chairs, foul breath, and excruciatingly dull jargon if not to avoid the echoes of what is not known), the psychic separation between what was happening on the floor, in the caucus rooms, in the headquarters, and what was happening in parallel to the history of the nation was mystery enough to drown the proceedings in gloom.

Introducing a literary conceit through which he will attempt to interpret events in Los Angeles: the Two Rivers.

Since the First World War Americans have been leading a double life, and our history has moved on two rivers, one visible, the other underground; there has been the history of politics which is concrete, factual, practical and unbelievably dull if not for the consequences of the actions of some of these men; and there is a subterranean river of untapped, ferocious, lonely and romantic desires, that concentration of ecstasy and violence which is the dream life of the nation.

Elsewhere he calls it “the myth.” Later he will claim: “The life of politics and the life of myth had diverged too far.” (That leads to boring conventions.) But Kennedy, he thought, might yoke them together, and that could be dangerous. Here he takes the long view of American history and how it “ended” in Los Angeles.

It was a country which had grown by the leap of one hero past another—is there a county in all of our ground which does not have its legendary figure? And when the West was filled, the expansion turned inward, became part of an agitated, overexcited, superheated dream life. The film studios threw up their searchlights as the frontier was finally sealed, and the romantic possibilities of the old conquest of land turned into a vertical myth, trapped within the skull, of a new kind of heroic life, each choosing his own archetype of a neo-renaissance man, be it Barrymore, Cagney, Flynn, Bogart, Brando or Sinatra…

On what nominating someone as glamorous as Jack Kennedy might mean:

No one had too much doubt that Kennedy would be nominated, but if elected he would be not only the youngest President ever to be chosen by voters, he would be the most conventionally attractive young man ever to sit in the White House, and his wife—some would claim it—might be the most beautiful First Lady in our history. Of necessity the myth would emerge once more, because America’s politics would now be also America’s favorite movie, America’s first soap opera, America’s best-seller…

On Kennedy’s genuine heroism in World War II:

A war hero, and the heroism is bona-fide, even exceptional, a man who has lived with death, who, crippled in the back, took on an operation which would kill him or restore him to power, who chose to marry a lady whose face might be too imaginative for the taste of a democracy which likes its first ladies to be executives of home-management, a man who courts political suicide by choosing to go all out for a nomination four, eight, or twelve years before his political elders think he is ready, a man who announces a week prior to the convention that the young are better fitted to direct history than the old. This is no routine candidate calling every shot by safety’s routine book.

This one (a glimpse from the Republican convention) speaks for itself:

“Yes,” Nixon said, naturally but terribly tired an hour after his nomination, the TV cameras and lights and microphones bringing out a sweat of fatigue on his face, the words coming very slowly from the tired brain, somber, modest, sober, slow, slow enough so that one could touch emphatically the cautions behind each word, “Yes, I want to say,” said Nixon, “that whatever abilities I have, I got from my mother.” A tired pause … dull moment of warning, “… and my father.” The connection now made, the rest comes easy, “… and my school and my church.” Such men are capable of anything….

I have saved the disclaimers for the end.

Superman Comes to the Supermarket is not really a “model” for reporters who will be covering the convention next week. For one thing, Mailer took his time. The piece—almost a novella in length—did not appear until months after the event, in the November, 1960 issue of Esquire. Nor am I saying that Mailer was “right” about Kennedy and the years to come, that he was the greatest convention reporter ever, that one should try to imitate his style (don’t, please) that the 60’s were so much more exciting and the journalism was too— or anything like that.

I’m also aware that many people today think of Mailer (now in his 80s) as a pretentious blowhard, marginal and irrelevant, or as a celebrity sexist. And of course there are equally many who have never heard of him and don’t care. As you’ll see, parts of “Superman” are bloated and all but unreadable, and some of it was ridiculous even then. And I am further aware that history has moved on. Reporting on John Kerry is, shall we say, less exciting than writing about Jack Kennedy, although the parallels are there. Also, the conventions today are nothing like what Mailer described in 1960. So let me state it before someone else does: you couldn’t do what he did today. My point lies elsewhere.

Last week, in writing about this editorial in the New York Times (finding “reason to hope” that “this year’s one potentially risky innovation — accepting dozens of free-form online bloggers as accredited convention journalists — may lace the proceedings with fresh insight”) I had occasion to add:

Fresh insight. Americans who pay attention to the news would welcome it. But how does something like that—a new source of insight—actually come into political reporting?

But it doesn’t have to be a new source. It can be an old source. You don’t have to do things the same old way. There are other, perhaps even older ways; and they may contain hidden instructions for journalists who feel boxed in by the Conventions and their own conventions for reporting on them. (There are more of these peoples than you think.)

“Journalism is chores,” wrote Mailer in 1974. “Journalism is bondage unless you can see yourself as a private eye inquiring into the mysteries of a new phenomenon.” As Tom Wolfe might say: a new phenomenon! This is what there won’t be in 2004, the press tells us: no real news, definitely no mystery (and hardly any television coverage.) That leaves chores, and 15,000 media people to complete them. There’s gotta be something better than that.

After Matter: Notes, reactions & links….

Short bio of Norman Mailer.

For context: Notes on the New Journalism by Michael J. Arlen (The Atlantic, May 1972).

Blogging: the new journalism? (from dot journalism, UK, March 25, 2003.)

Posted by Jay Rosen at July 21, 2004 8:57 AM   Print


Thank you, Jay. This is a wonderful piece and a reminder of the twin joys of language and political expression.

Posted by: Matt Stoller at July 21, 2004 10:54 AM | Permalink

Much shorter version: "Let in a bunch of freelance writers, maybe they'll write something interesting".

Posted by: Seth Finkelstein at July 21, 2004 11:01 AM | Permalink

Thanks, Matt.

Yep, you're so right, Seth. I could have written 20 words and gotten the very same points across, but decided 2,000+ would be better because... well, because I like to waste people's time, don't know what do with my own, and it's fun to make users scroll and scroll.

Posted by: Jay Rosen at July 21, 2004 2:45 PM | Permalink

Jay: I could have written 20 words and gotten the very same points across, but decided 2,000+ would be better because...

I didn't count Jay, but did you really write 2,000+ words, or did Mailer write them?

BTW, I appreciated you snipping Mailer as an alternative to wading through the "almost" novella online.

I appreciate the essay entirely, as usual.

Posted by: Tim at July 21, 2004 3:02 PM | Permalink


I was quite disappointed with your interview this past Monday on WNYC. You were asked a question about what bloggers could contribute that journalists couldn't. You said something to the effect that journalists, like those working for Newsweek, have specific obligations that bloggers don't. What are these "specific obligations"?

And, you still haven't answered the interviewer's question. Are you practicing for a possible political career and therefore practices your powers of obfuscation? It's funny when you hear blogosphere cants on other media. It's sound so phoney. Could the echo chamber be this small and insular?.

Posted by: Rick Hausen at July 21, 2004 3:29 PM | Permalink

Rick: I meant things like...

* They have to file their story by certain deadlines, I don't.

* They have to investigate things their editors think are stories or possible stories, I don't.

* They have to write to tight word count in Newsweek's style and I don't.

* They have to get quotes from people if they want to say certain things or make certain points, and I don't.

* They have to fit into a reigning formula for what a "Newsweek piece" is, what a worthwhile idea at Newsweek is, and I don't.

* They have to appeal to millions of readers, and I don't.

Clear enough?

By the way, you can listen here to the interview, which I don't hold up as any great shakes. It's just an interview on something that was in the news.

Posted by: Jay Rosen at July 21, 2004 6:05 PM | Permalink

Jay, I think you can talk all you want to about what the bloggers will bring to the convention, but look at what the party will get out of it. The Democrats learned from Howard Dean just how powerful the Internet can be, they are using it to greater extent even now than anyone has before. I expect after some thinking that it may not be important to the political process but that they will be saying it on the internet. I don't care what you say about me, just spell my name right.

Posted by: Chuck Rightmire at July 21, 2004 9:08 PM | Permalink

That's like saying that you can play baseball better than Derek Jeter because...

*You don't have to deal with George Steinbrenner.

*You wouldn't worry about producing HRs, RBIs, etc. and then have to worry about contract negotiations.

*You wouldn't lunge into the stands to try to catch a foul ball.

*You wouldn't have to perform when the stakes are high.

You're too damned comfortable and smug like the other bloggers. You're probably not even a New Yorker. Show me someone's who scared and angry. And, I agree, that interview was a waste of my time.

I was thinking of submitting an application to the NYU j-school. Now I'm having second thoughts. And furthermore, I should be at that convention and not you.

Posted by: Rick Hausen at July 21, 2004 9:08 PM | Permalink

Chuck: I agree with you that inviting 35 bloggers to a convention of some 30,000 people is not going to be very important in this year's political process.

Posted by: Jay Rosen at July 21, 2004 9:20 PM | Permalink

Just to affirm that class has nothing to do with it, here's a quote from the website that posted the tortious defamations of Y:

If there’s one thing lower than a journalist, it’s someone who aspires to become one. And if there’s anything lower than that, it’s a journalism student who can’t get into a better school than Cal State, which will admit almost anyone with a pulse.

Posted by: panopticon at July 22, 2004 1:17 AM | Permalink

k.i.s.s. of the panopticon

Dougie Bicket

Good stuff.

Posted by: Foucault at July 22, 2004 1:56 AM | Permalink

panopticon I like you. I'm not "York," BTW.

The bloggers would like you to think that they're the desperadoes of the media universe. Fact is, they're carefully constructing their own orthodoxy and hierarchy, and this convention business plays nicely into this strategy.

Y'know, big fish, little pond.

It's about progress, whether it be through authenticity or artifice. Even flawed works of art, as in "Uncle Tom's Cabin" can serve as the nidus for social change. Please don't be all rah rah about your new medium. It smacks of hubris, especially if you don't have anything worthwhile to say.

Yes, I seek to be credentialed by Norman Mailer himself to attend the narcissists' convention.

Posted by: Rick Hausen at July 22, 2004 8:10 AM | Permalink

Just to assure everyone, I won't post any more comments here, or read this blog. Hate to bring down the house of cards.

Please resume bland blogging. Au revoir.

(Although it is very satisfying when you see that little puff of white dust as the ball you serve clips the corner of the serving box. Ace!)

Posted by: Rick Hausen at July 22, 2004 8:53 AM | Permalink

Fact is, they're carefully constructing their own orthodoxy and hierarchy, and this convention business plays nicely into this strategy.

Check this out:


The more popular your blog is, the more advertising value it has for us and the steeper the discount we'll offer. If you are super-popular, you can have a 1 cent copy!

Thinstall has a application installer software that they'd like to get more bloggers interested in. It's not meant for use in blogging, but they want to leverage the word-of-mouth power of blogs to spread the word. So the higher your pagerank, the more the discount.

I think this pricing scheme is great. But its more relevant for blogging-related softwares. Movabletype, take note!

My pagerank used to be 5. Dammit. Because of the server shut down and the loss of my files, my pagerank just dropped to 4.

Posted by: panopticon at July 22, 2004 12:48 PM | Permalink

Jay, my point was not that it isn't important to the political process but that the importance lies not in what they say but in the fact that they will say it on the Internet. Thirty-five of them may not be many, but with the comments and links, they will get a lot of internet time. And the fact they say it on the internet will be what's important, not what they say. In other words we may be looking at an early use of the new "television" for political access.

Posted by: Chuck Rightmire at July 22, 2004 10:40 PM | Permalink

I misunderstood. Thanks for clarifying, Chuck. It's true that if you take the online space as an influence sphere of its own, the bloggers sometimes dominate there, or at least run even with even the biggest news organizations.

Posted by: Jay Rosen at July 23, 2004 7:35 AM | Permalink

nice site i really like it

Posted by: Robert Minter at September 10, 2004 1:48 PM | Permalink

nice site i really like it

Posted by: Sam Hakluyt at September 11, 2004 1:07 PM | Permalink

899 play texas hold em online here.

Posted by: texas hold em at October 12, 2004 9:05 AM | Permalink


texas holdem

Posted by: texas holdem at October 13, 2004 8:46 PM | Permalink


texas hold em

Posted by: texas hold em at October 15, 2004 11:42 AM | Permalink

5539 http://video-poker.uni.cccheck it out! Video Poker yabba dabba doo
online Video Poker

Posted by: at October 17, 2004 12:01 AM | Permalink


Posted by: roulette at October 18, 2004 9:31 PM | Permalink

611 You know anti wrinkle cream
can work Did you know online degree gets you jobs? online degrees

Posted by: wrinkle cream at October 22, 2004 7:12 AM | Permalink

2061 online casino games

Posted by: casino games at October 22, 2004 1:45 PM | Permalink

PlLAY the best
debt consolidation only.

Posted by: blackjack games at October 27, 2004 4:28 AM | Permalink

Offering Cialis with overnight delivery. Also, If your looking for generic cialis this is a good site to visit.

Posted by: Cialis at October 27, 2004 6:16 AM | Permalink

8525 .Way to poker online.

Posted by: online poker at October 27, 2004 2:29 PM | Permalink

6659 slots click here to play
online slots

Posted by: slots at October 30, 2004 5:56 PM | Permalink

7061 Ttry playing online pokeronline.

Posted by: online poker at November 2, 2004 5:25 PM | Permalink

From the Intro