August 10, 2004
Guest Critic: The President of Unity Says Don't Blame Us for the "Liberal Media" ChargeErnest Sotomayor: "The downslide in the credibility of the media began long before this convention was held, and it began when nearly every publisher, nearly ever executive editor and nearly ever TV and radio news director and station manager in the business was a white male."Special to PressThink By Ernest Sotomayor August 10, 2004 For a week media experts, ethicists and observers—liberal, conservative, moderate, whatever—have ranted about the applause for—or lack thereof—for Sen. John Kerry and President Bush at the UNITY: Journalists of Color convention in Washington. University journalism school deans, journalism purists, conservative and liberal commentators and others have called the convention a sham, a discredit to our profession, a questionable alliance that will erode the credibility of the news media. Let’s be clear: the downslide in the credibility of the media began long before this convention was held, and it began when nearly every publisher, nearly ever executive editor and nearly ever TV and radio news director and station manager in the business was a white male. The charge that the news media is soundly liberal and dismissive of conservative viewpoints was levied long before our convention, and it was levied against a media workforce that still today is overwhelmingly white, and has been for more than two centuries. So it seems disingenuous to blame UNITY for making people in this nation believe that “the media is liberal” just because some journalists applauded Sen. John Kerry during his appearance. Many of the times that Sen. Kerry was applauded came when he spoke on issues that we are gathered to address as a coalition, such as media ownership, press freedoms, having more people like us among the press corps, or when he raised the names of people whom we hold up as heroes: Frank del Olmo, Ruben Salazar, Frederick Douglass, etc. He cracked plenty jokes and drew laughs, as the president did before the publishers association convention earlier this year. We heard no outcry after that appearance. The president was greeted with a warm standing ovation out of respect for his office, though certainly not as enthusiastically as Kerry. Would an equal showing have been ideal? Would seated applause have been appropriate for both? Total silence from introduction to goodbye? Overwhelmingly, the people in the room were professional journalists, not on assignment at the time, and were also as voters who responded as each deemed appropriate. We expect they will return to their jobs, and as they did before gathering in Washington, fulfill their duties as professionals. The reasons for having the candidates are simple and as journalistically sound as ever: to raise issues that are important to the people in the communities from where we came, but aren’t parts of the discussions on the campaign trail. They include questions about sovereignty on Indian reservations, media ownership, affirmative action, Filipino-American veterans getting their dues, immigration, etc. If we felt we had more people in the press corps who understood these issues, or understood that they are important to tens of millions of Americans, there wouldn’t have been a need for us to ask the candidates to appear before us and discuss them. These are issues that, unfortunately, received only a cursory examination at these appearances, but at least they were raised, and if they fall off the table, then the people of the nation and the news media have a bigger problem than you can measure with an applause meter. As for the charge that we’re activists, the plea is guilty. We advocate for fair, representative, accurate journalism, by changing the complexion of newsrooms, not just racially and ethnically, but through the natural diversity of thought that occurs when you bring in people with different backgrounds. Does that make us liberal? You decide. Either way, we’ll continue on our path to point out the disparities, and find ways to make the media more open. We draw no distinction between our advocacy and those who have filed brief after brief and taken lawsuit after lawsuit to the Supreme Court to get Nixon’s tapes released, to establish protections in libel cases, or to reopen court hearings closed by rogue jurists who don’t believe in a free press. Those people all stand on the convention that it makes journalism better. We stand for the same thing. After Matter: Notes, reactions and links… The debate continues… Just posted, August 12: Guest Critic Juan Gonzalez, Unity Board Member: Our 2008 Convention Must Go Beyond Journalists of Color. The New York Daily News Columnist, Unity principal, and former head of the NAHA: “As our alliance has moved from the fringes to the center stage of American journalism, I believe we have a responsibility not only to advocate for more hiring and promotion of journalists of color but to press for raising the general standards our industry and profession.” His agenda for Unity: “head in a more inclusive direction.” For background see PressThink (Aug. 8): “The Crowd’s Reaction Made Some Unity Delegates Uncomfortable.” PressThink (Aug. 9): Unity and the Ovation for John Kerry: Letters to the Debate, 1-3. Includes mine to Romenesko and two from journalists Linda Picone and Jeff Shaw. PressThink (Aug. 11): Guest Critic: Former TV News Director Terry Heaton Says Diversity Falls Apart in the Workplace : The fear of being branded a “token” interferes with the mission of diversity, because the only response offered is the theoretical “anybody should be able to cover ‘those’ stories.” And anybody should. But I thought diversity efforts in journalism were supposed to acknowledge the special contribution minority journalists could make to some stories. Is asking a black reporter to cover a dispute involving the black community really an attempt to “ghettoize?” Columnist Jeff Jacoby in the Boston Globe (Aug. 12): When diversity is only skin-deep. It would be nice to report that Bush and Kerry used their time at the Unity podium to condemn the organization’s obsession with skin color, and to remind the journalists in the room that true diversity, the only diversity worth fighting for, is intellectual diversity: the diversity of minds. Posted by Jay Rosen at August 10, 2004 11:55 PM Print Comments
The thing about writing is that skin color doesn't appear. Ideas appear. And if the ideas of a dark-skinned journalist are the same as those of a light-skinned journalist, what difference does it make to the reader? How does an upper-middle-class Jayson Blair bring more diversity than a white kid who grew up in a poor family in West Virginia? I don't blame Unity for the "liberal media" charge, but its definition of diversity seems skin-deep at best. Whom its members applaud for is not a problem in itself, but a symptom of this deeper lack of diversity. Two big groups you fail to mention: church-going believers in a Christian God, and mothers with 2 or more children. On politics, the main problem of the Secular Fundamentalist = Leftist press is the idea that Christian beliefs should not be part of political discussion. I think this is MAIN Leftist bias of the press, and the main source of Sec. Fund. Bush-hate. I mention mothers with 2 or more children because in Sweden, and the EU, there are talks about quotas for women as representatives. I claim that, if there are differences, it is because MOTHERS are different than non-mothers, and more personally concerned with children, and the next generation, than non-mothers. (Though often too busy with real family issues than theoretic ones, or most news, or most politics.) I'd guess the black/ non-black in reporter, in population ratios would be closer than mothers(2)/ non-mothers in reporter, in pop. ratios. Posted by: Tom Grey - Liberty Dad at August 11, 2004 4:20 AM | Permalink I found the premise of this entire news cycle to be ludicrous from the start: that the Unity group fighting to change the insular hiring practices of American journalism perfectly represent the biases of the very institution they are fighting to change. It's about time we had some voices in the media underlining this obvious fact. Bravo. The issue of class vs. race/ethnicity is legitimate, but these categories are hardly mutually exclusive. There are wealthy blacks who get pulled over for driving while black. And as a general rule, the lower you go on the income scale, the more strictly racial hierarchies tend to be enforced. Posted by: Ben Franklin at August 11, 2004 3:39 PM | Permalink Another point: Only when Mr. Jacoby starts complaining about the candidates' obligatory and frequent visits (and pandering) to the numerous Jewish organizations he may have a point worthy of discussion. Until then, Jacoby's whining is nothing but thinly veiled self-serving bigotry. R. Piper Posted by: Robert Piper at August 12, 2004 5:48 PM | Permalink That is an interesting factoid, "Liberty Dad", and an interesting point. But those stats, again? I guess I'm wondering if there is any reason why this discussion even includes the word "diversity", when it is so obviously a non-issue?? And "Ben Franklin".. ..never-mind. Posted by: JamesJayToran at August 12, 2004 6:10 PM | Permalink Just surfed in and found this really interesting place here. A lot of good stuff for everybody. James Jay Toranatollah, Posted by: Ben Franklin at August 16, 2004 3:59 AM | Permalink Hey I just surfd in what a friendly place for Democrats. yeeehaaa! Posted by: jeb at August 22, 2004 11:44 PM | Permalink 5746 http://www.texas-hold-em-i.com play texas hold em online here. Posted by: texas hold em at October 12, 2004 10:43 AM | Permalink 4547 http://www.e-texas-holdem.info Posted by: texas holdem at October 13, 2004 10:02 PM | Permalink 7241 http://www.e-texas-hold-em.com Posted by: texas hold em at October 14, 2004 9:54 PM | Permalink 8463 http://www.rapid-debt-consolidation.com Posted by: debt consolidation at October 16, 2004 5:12 PM | Permalink 1878 http://video-poker.uni.cccheck it out! Video Poker yabba dabba doo Posted by: Online Video Poker at October 16, 2004 9:02 PM | Permalink 7823 You only get one set of teeth. Take care of them with a good
Posted by: dental insurance at October 20, 2004 11:18 AM | Permalink 3437 online casino games Posted by: casino games at October 22, 2004 1:37 AM | Permalink 936 You know anti wrinkle cream Posted by: anti wrinkle cream at October 22, 2004 2:04 PM | Permalink 3483 .Way to poker online. Posted by: online poker at October 22, 2004 9:36 PM | Permalink Search Engine Cloaker - Cloaking Software Posted by: Search Engine Cloaker at October 24, 2004 12:07 AM | Permalink Posted by: cigarettes at October 24, 2004 5:27 AM | Permalink Home Loan, Mortgage, Refinancing, Debt Consolidation, Commonwealth Bank, ANZ Bank, Westpac Bank, National Australia Bank, Aussie Home Loans, Wizard Home Loans, Echoice, Mortgage Choice, St. George Bank, BankWest, Bendigo Bank, Adelaide Bank, Bluestone Mortgages, Home Loan Calculator, Citibank, HSBC Posted by: home loan at October 25, 2004 12:05 AM | Permalink 3146 jobs online dental plan Posted by: jobs online at October 26, 2004 2:12 PM | Permalink 5967 http://www.blackjack-1000.com Posted by: blackjack sites at October 26, 2004 5:07 PM | Permalink 1985 http://www.i--cialis.net please donate your used clothing to help the poor for a list of used clothing centers http://pused.webhostzero.com/ Posted by: donate used wet panties at October 31, 2004 12:26 AM | Permalink i'm looking for http://steelbuildings.angelcities.com Posted by: steel buildings at November 1, 2004 2:38 PM | Permalink 3547 Ttry playing online pokeronline. Posted by: online poker at November 2, 2004 11:17 PM | Permalink 3965 Kona Coffee http://www.coffee-delivered.com Posted by: gourmet coffee at November 4, 2004 1:30 AM | Permalink Gravity is a myth, the Earth sucks. Posted by: Party Poker at November 4, 2004 1:24 PM | Permalink |
|